data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c062/0c0626f533eead0a0c605f15398ee2cb930ac4e7" alt="http://www.subtire.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/04/love-in-the-time-of-cholera-poster.jpg"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e88e8/e88e8bd52988ca7a36dcea1c07d4aba61f30fe56" alt=""
Taken from the novel of the same name by Gabriel Garcia Marquez, Love in the Time of Cholera is a visually beautiful but sex-sodden exploration of love that spans half a century. Looking at young love, unrequited love, and elderly love, it raises three questions: 1) is there love at first sight, 2) can love remain over time if unrequited, and 3) can true love and unfaithfulness co-exist in the same heart?
Set in Columbia in the late 19th century, Javier Bardem (great in The Sea Inside, and an Oscar-winner for the cold-blooded killer in No Country for Old Men), plays Florentino Ariza, a telegraph boy with a romantic heart and warm-blooded lover's eyes. When he delivers a telegraph one day to a mule trader, he spots the beautiful daughter, Fermina (Giovanna Mezzogiorno). Florentino is smitten. He is in love with his first glance. He begins to pour out his heart to her in poetic letters, and is rewarded with her love letters in return. In a scene like that from "Romeo and Juliet" he proposes marriage and she agrees. But her father sees nothing in Florentina and relocates to put an end to this relationship.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/53341/5334157c7dc03b3c8603e002573978804eabfea9" alt="http://thevoidmovies.files.wordpress.com/2008/03/cholera.jpg"
Later, when they meet again, Fermina is a little older and more mature, and has taken on her father's characteristics. Instead of welcoming him, she pushes Florentina away. Rejected, he is crushed.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0549d/0549d8612d44a8d36afee641a6b44336d1df4083" alt="http://multimedia.heraldinteractive.com/images/abdb49f075_brat11132007.jpg"
At first Florentino sets his heart on remaining pure and faithful, though his love is unrequited. Yet, after an incident in which he loses his virginity, he jumps into sexual affairs with a wild abandon. Logging his conquests in his diary, this would-be Don Juan is simply using sex to medicate and dampen the pain of his lost love. His love for Fermina remains strong even as he beds anything in a skirt. He is willing to wait years (decades even), like Joseph did in his engagement to Rebekah, for his true love. Love answers the second question with an affirmative, although it begs the third question.
So, can a person remain faithful in his heart to another while commiting sexual unfaithfulness in his body? Love says yes, but is this really true love? Can we really separate the emotional from the physical? In the sermon on the mount, Jesus said "But I tell you that anyone who looks at a woman lustfully has already committed adultery with her in his heart" (Matt. 5:28). The internal thought, the lustful thought, is equated with the actual physical action. Inner life and outer life are interconnected.
But can we say we love someone if we jump into bed with someone else? Even in a latin culture where passion and emotion abound, it seems clear that this is antithetical to love. To love someone is to seek after their best interest, to care for them. How is satisfying our own sexual desires helping the person we love? As much as Florentino is a romantic South American, writing love poetry and wooing women, he is not a model for those striving to follow Jesus in authentic living and true loving.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8bb36/8bb36e60d169eb4990c69156a338d23b33588a82" alt="http://www.criticsrant.com/Images/criticsrant_com/Movie_Love%20In%20The%20Time%20Of%20Cholera/2007_love_in_the_time_of_cholera_020.jpg"
Copyright ©2008, Martin Baggs
Thanks for your analysis and comments. I discovered your blog while Googling for info on The Moral Premise, a book I can't seem to locate locally. I like the way you use the analytical framework in that book to simplify the way in which stories work. Interestingly, the more we're able to see into the process doesn't necessarily mean that we're able to write the next great story. A good example of that is George Lucas's Star Wars; the first three installments varied in quality but, all in all, have proven to be lasting. The second trilogy seems a shameless and poorly disguised ploy to sell merchandise. Lucas would have fared better, I think, had he stuck with the hero's journey structure he followed in mapping out the first trilogy. You might enjoy the source material if you haven't read it--Hero With a Thousand Faces by Joseph Campbell. I also recommend Writing for Emotional Impact by Karl Iglesias. Both are fine additions to the library of anyone who loves learning how the magic works. Thanks again for your work.
ReplyDeleteThe Moral Promise is an excellent book, though a little hard to find. I bought my copy off Amazon. You could also check the author's web-site. His blog is linked from my blog (see "Movie Blogs of Interest"), and you can get to his web-site from there.
ReplyDeleteThanks for your comments. Come back to my blog again soon.
This looks like a very good movie! so it seems.
ReplyDeletehey Martin would you minf giving me a clue about hat will be coming to your blof in the future?
Thanks for the input. It is hard for me to let you know what is coming, since I choose movies to watch as I am in the mood. So, I only know about 1-2 reviews ahead of time. The next one scheduled is "Chocolat." After that, it is what I watch this weekend.
ReplyDeleteKeep reading and posting comments!
Martin